Ravings of a BiPolar Gothic Witch
     Occasional commentary, observations and tidbits as well as other random thoughts

The Three Question Personality Test


Your Personality Is

Idealist (NF)

You are a passionate, caring, and unique person.
You are good at expressing yourself and sharing your ideals.

You are the most compassionate of all types and connect with others easily.
Your heart tends to rule you. You can’t make decisions without considering feelings.

You seek out other empathetic people to befriend.
Truth and authenticity matters in your friendships.

In love, you give everything you have to relationships. You fall in love easily.

At work, you crave personal expression and meaning in your career.

With others, you communicate well. You can spend all night talking with someone.

As far as your looks go, you’ve likely taken the time to develop your own personal style.

On weekends, you like to be with others. Charity work is also a favorite pastime of yours.

Quizzes and whizzles Dec 10th, 2005, 2:33:35 pm

Reality as perception, Part 2

Wow two posts a day for a while. Guess a lot has been on my mind. A lot of it is just blathering… but I hope that some of it makes people think. Even if their thoughts have to do with the strange twisted person sitting on the other side of this keyboard.

My previous post was actually supposed to be about how people live in the US and avoid feeling responsible for the terrible poverty all around them, the homeless, the brilliant children who can’t think in school because they haven’t eaten for a couple days or maybe their brother just got shot in a gang war, the women struggling to raise children by themselves and provide good homes for them, work, and make sure that they do their homework, not to mention maybe get to play and cuddle a little. That was where the whole “dreamed reality” thing was coming in and then I totally went off in another direction. But I come back to it now.

People who are in middle income brackets, who own homes, go to work each day, do their duty of Sunday church without examining their thoughts or feelings, are the sheep I refer to. They blindly do whatever it is they are taught is supposed to be done. This goes across all societal income levels I know but I pick on the middle class because it is comfortable enough to live, yet sees no bounty in what it has.

The upper class people that I have met, at least those in New Orleans, (I didn’t know any in politics so I don’t know about them), they were taught from the cradle to have a responsibility to do good with their money. No that doesn’t mean they didn’t sneer at the poor, or feel that it was somehow their fault, or close their eyes or turn their heads at the beggar on the street. But it does mean that to some extent, they were taught that as a part of their priviledge they had a “noblesse oblige” to do good work.

I worked at the most prestigous prep school in New Orleans for a while. All of the very priviledged kids went there. And there were two lessons about money I took away. The first was that their families did take it very seriously. One particular money family (there were several cousins of this family in the school) made each child responsible for some project in which they were expected to oversee and participate each week. It was a big responsibility, and taken very seriously.

The second was that money wasn’t any cure for unhappiness. Of the two families I’m talking about, there were two brothers decended from the line. Both had married women from old money families. And both married women had jumped off the Huey P Long within a few years of each other leaving their children and lives behind. Sort of like Princess Diana, although not really, unless they’d been pushed.

Of course, that didn’t stop these high school kids from being the Paris Hilton type either. One day a girl sat at my lunch table and complained about the Bugatti her father had given her for her birthday. Don’t know what that is? Neither did I. I went home and asked my husband. Here one is.

But the upper class does seem to feel that there is something important about trying to improve things, even if it is considered a duty and not a true passion.

The lower class, well they are the ones we’re talking about here. The people who live one paycheck from disaster, the ones who’ve hit the wall and live the disaster, and those who have mental illness and can’t help themselves, and their parents couldn’t help them because they didn’t have the millions of $$ for treatment. The children who see violence by their homes every day. The gang members who might have been engineers except for where they were born. The starving people with nothing to eat and no where warm to go.

It’s the middle class that I’m talking about. Yes you. The ones who have money in the bank, and solid jobs, and go drink a beer with the boys on Saturday nights. You are coddled into your beliefs that everything is safe and warm, and your perception doesn’t see the connection between you and those children. But there is. There is a tether between the entire web of humans. It is my belief that those sheep who are so wrapped up in their blanket of fuzzy perception, willing to give up each right we were given as humans to pursue life and liberty and the joy of living, willing to hand over what is precious and a birthright of each human living on the planet, it is those sheep who under examination validate my statement that life is perception. In truth, I don’t believe that the data of people standing on street corners, or the sound of the news about poverty, and violence, and those thousands of people stranded in New Orleans without food, water or even a way to take care of the dead and dying, and certainly not any feelings regarding anything that might damage their own cocoons of safety, that data is filtered out as noise. They just never consciously receive it. Those neuron receptors were turned off some where along the way. And that is how people sanction such horrible continuance of a great number of things that plague us here on this insignificant ball of water.

It isn’t that people are genuinely mean, or intentionally attempt to keep people down or poor or unhealthy. (Well some do, but that is a different rant). It’s that they just don’t see/hear/feel it. They are not capable of perceiving it. Again proving that perception shapes reality for all of us.

Ramblings Dec 10th, 2005, 10:56:32 am

Reality as perception

I write a lot about outrage of the various exploits and idiocies of our leaders, something that is pretty easy to go given how stupid and meglomaniac those leaders are. I also commonly refer to most people as sheep, willing to be led around by their genitals just to allow themselves the illusion that all is well. They live in a dream where they work, eat and sleep, and sometimes find time to play stupid games with others in their own dream of reality.

And afterall, my core belief that my spirituality and my scientific mind wrap around is that reality is a shared perception. Our brains, being physically based beings are limited to what we see and feel and hear. But it is a paradox. Our brains are also that which controls what we SHOULD see, feel and hear. If the brain doesn’t recognize the input, we never process it. Scientists have found that human beings actually take in a great deal more with eyes and ears than we really ever allow to become conscious. In other words, data from our universe is streaming into our brains at 10 x or so the rate that we can be aware of. So if all of that data is coming in, and our brains only process 10%, what determines which 10%?

Obviously a great deal is decided by what our brain perceives is reality. The things around us are “solid”. The ground is more solid than the air. Each person has characteristics that we perceive to be human (2 eyes, 2 ears, a mouth, 4 limbs, and one of 2 sex types, etc etc). However, given the brain’s we have and their control over us, would we be able to see, hear or feel ANYTHING that is out of the given shared reality of humans? Maybe if something were so outside what we perceive to be our reality, our brain would file it away as “noise” and we would never consciously access it. It would be there as data, but we wouldn’t ever see, hear or feel it.

That opens up huge realms of possibilities. A science fiction possibility would be that there could be aliens all around us, and because they are so out of our ability to comprehend we just don’t see them. That would be a fun story. Maybe I’ll work on that. But another is the concept of teaching the mind to process ALL of the data without the prejudice of our reality to hamper us. See this cool definition of perception! Gotta love wikipedia!

I was about to write that since we only use 10% of our brains, and that the rest could be where all that “noise” is stored. That took me to wikipedia (trying to find the exact percent) and I LEARNED today, that the notion of using only part of our brains is a MYTH!!! Cool huh? I can learn, and then incorporate that learning into an article that was about to use the opposite of what I learned. Because even though we use all of our brains (in other words each part of the brain has been identified as having some very neccesary function) it also said that more intelligent people use their brain LESS than others. Meaning less neurons fire for intelligent thought processes than for people who have to think about things harder. And that if ALL the neurons fire at the same time, it’s called an epilipetic seizure. (Has any one checked to see if “W” is epileptic?).

Seriously though, doesn’t that also imply that if intelligent people use their brains less, there is the capability to simultaneously use their brains more on many different levels? But all of that is just side talk to the real meat of this writing. I propose that our brains can only process what is understood by them in some context, and while the wikipedia failed me in the whole percentage of brain use argument, it did uphold that concept.

That my friends, is why I’m in physics. It is not our universe that holds us back from unimaginable new theories and ways of seeing it or traveling through it, but our perception of our universe as something completely concrete and defined by the laws which those who have gone before us have discovered. Without leaps in intuitive perception it is doubtful that Einstein, or Newton, or Galileo, or Aristotle could have come up with the theories/laws that we now believe to be scientific. If they had listened to the scientists of the time, and their reality had made up of those perceptions as being completely real, they could not have gone outside of them to find new reality.

How far does it go? I don’t know. How deep does the rabbit hole go? But I pursue my life’s dream to find out.

Ramblings Dec 10th, 2005, 9:31:23 am


« »

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here